SP
Community engagement and power shifting are not the same. In this second post of the series, Jasmine Williams-Washington examines when participation is appropriate and when institutions must share real decisionmaking authority. Through practical examples and reflections from philanthropy and public systems, the article explores how organizations can align responsibility, authority, and trust in community change.
Engagement brings community voice into decisions. Power shifting changes who decides.
True sustainability isn’t about programs that end—it’s about communities that keep solving problems. Learn how community capacity shapes resilience, equity, and enduring impact.
Polarization and disconnection are real—but “sense of community” doesn’t have to be a vague ideal. See how Community Science measures belonging, influence, and connection—and turns the results into practical strategies that help partners target resources, bridge divides, and track progress over time.
Public life feels exhausting in an era of polarization and isolation. This piece argues that “community” isn’t sentimental—it’s a practical, evidence-based strategy for strengthening well-being and civic resilience. Drawing on research about belonging, influence, and shared connection, it shows how diverse people can work together on common needs—even in unlikely places.
Civil society is under pressure — trust is declining, advocacy is weakening, and communities are increasingly fragmented. This blog explores how the social sector can rebuild collective power through trust, movement-building, coordinated action, and deep community engagement.
