Ideas

In the first blog, Where to Go from Here: Chaos, Cancellation, Conflict, or Community, we argue for choosing community because it’s a universal human need. Community isn’t just a feeling, it shows up in concrete ways that meet people’s needs, foster belonging and trust, enable collective influence, and build shared emotional connection. Community Science has helped organizations assess sense of community and recommended community strengthening strategies.

In the second blog, What Makes Community Capacity the Foundation for Lasting, Equitable Change?, we build on the idea of strength by focusing on how communities use that sense of connection to drive action and sustain change. We define community capacity as the ability to consistently identify challenges, leverage strengths, mobilize resources, and work collectively to create lasting change — highlighting the reinforcing cycle in which a strong sense of community fuels action, and those actions further deepen that sense of community.

In the third blog, Building the Community Capacity Infrastructure, we outline how to build the infrastructure and the role intermediaries play. We suggest starting by engaging your ecosystem, mapping key resources (e.g., intermediaries, technical assistance, funding, networks), and convening partners, especially community-led organizations, to understand gaps and opportunities.

This blog answers the next question: Once you assess community capacity, how do you move to action in a way that promotes well-being and stronger communities? As a reminder, we view capacity as knowledge, skills, resources, and relationships within an organization or community.

Step 1: Ground Capacity Building in Specific Changes
Community capacity isn’t abstract — it is directly tied to a specific goal or objective of an initiative along with those resources that contribute to effective organizations and community power building processes.

Start by clearly defining:

• What capacities are most important? Different strategies require different capacities, for instance:
  • Mobilizing residents requires community organizing skills;
  • Changing policies and institutional practices requires advocacy skills;
  • Collaborating across sectors requires knowledge about systems and skills to coordinate and align institutions with different agendas;
  • Developing small business entrepreneurs takes leadership development, business development, and educational skills; and
  • All strategies require all participating organizations to be effective and well managed.
• Where do you begin? First focus, based on your strategy, where there tends to be the biggest gaps in capacity:
  • Community power building (e.g., organizing, advocacy, collaboration);
  • Knowledge, skills, and relations for community development and problem solving (e.g. housing, safety, community economic development); or
  • Community and nonprofit organizational effectiveness and well-being (e.g., management, funding, human resources).
• Which organizations and institutions can provide appropriate and sustained training, consultation, and other forms of technical assistance related to those identified capacities to the members of participating organizations?
• Who else needs to be involved in the planning and implementation of this effort? Are the communities most affected represented as equal partners?

Three competencies are essential no matter the strategy: skills to build trust, foster relationships, and deal with conflict.

Step 2: Prioritize and Sequence Investments
Assessment results should drive clear, disciplined investment choices — not broad wish lists. Implement in phases. Ask yourselves:

• Which capacities are most critical right now? Which capacities are critical in the future that we can’t lose sight of?
• Which organizations need strengthening and for what purpose?
• What types of support are required, including leadership development, technical assistance, facilitation and coordination, coaching, and, of course, funding?

This reflects evidence that capacity building is most effective when it is targeted, staged, and aligned with strategy.

Step 3: Strengthen or Establish an Intermediary Organization as the Hub
Sustainable efforts require a dedicated entity responsible for coordination and capacity building. This intermediary role includes (see blog Building the Community Capacity Infrastructure: How Communities Develop the Power to Solve Their Most Complex Problems):

• Delivering and coordinating capacity building resources across organizations and sectors;
• Managing data, learning, and communication;
• Aligning funding, technical assistance, and other support;
• Facilitating community representation in public and private sector decisionmaking; and
• Promoting a positive and effective community narrative.

If no such entity exists, identify a trusted organization that could begin and grow into the role, or invest in creating and resourcing a new intermediary.

Step 4: Develop a Practical Capacity Building Plan — Not a Wish List
A strong next step is creating an actionable, time-bound capacity building plan grounded in both goals and assessment findings. This plan should:

• Define priority capacities (what to build);
• Specify who does what (roles and responsibilities);
• Identify support needed (funding, technical assistance, coaching);
• Include milestones and timelines;
• Establish indicators of progress; and
• Lay out frequent feedback loops and decisionmaking points.

Don’t try to fix everything at once; instead, apply a developmental approach by starting with near-term wins (6–12 months), building momentum before scaling, and adapting as capacity grows. This aligns with research emphasizing incremental and developmental capacity building.

Step 5: Build in Rapid Learning and Adaptation
Evaluation shouldn’t be an afterthought — it should support real-time decisionmaking and continuous strategy improvement. Focus on:

• Short feedback loops (e.g., quarterly reflection cycles);
• Practical and actionable indicators (not overly complex metrics); and
• Learning questions such as:
  • What is working and for whom?
  • What isn’t working and for whom?
  • What needs to change now?

The Bigger Shift: From Assessment to a New Way of Working
Moving from assessment to action requires a shift:

• Programs → Systems Building
• Activities → A Capacity Focus
• Individual Efforts → Coordinated infrastructure and Collective Action

Assessment is not the end; it’s the entry point into sustained, collective action.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

1. Assuming that capacity building assistance is fully in place at the launch of an initiative.
   Don’t miss the first step of assessing the state of the current infrastructure, no matter your assumptions.
2. Over-planning and under-acting, which often leads to people’s disengagement.
   Move forward when the assessment findings are “good enough.”
3. Rushing without inclusion and in the process, harming relationships before you even build them.
   Be intentional about who is engaged, authentically and respectfully — especially those historically excluded.
4. Using one-size-fits-all approaches, which demonstrate poor understanding of histories and cultures, further contributing to inequities.
   Tailor strategies to different communities, cultures, and organizational roles.
5. Ignoring power dynamics, limiting institutional and systemic change.
   Address inequities in access and influence between institutions and community groups.
6. Neglecting sense of community.
   Continue building bridges and shared identity alongside technical capacity.

Final Thought
Lasting change depends on more than strong programs — it depends on community strength.
Community capacity makes change possible. Infrastructure sustains it. And disciplined, strategic action after assessment is what brings both to life.

If you want Community Science’s assistance in building a community capacity infrastructure, please contact Kien Lee, kien@communityscience.com.

Bibliography
Bopp, M., GermAnn, K., Bopp, J., Baugh Littlejohns, L., & Smith, N. (2017). Assessing community capacity for change: A framework and toolkit. Tamarack Institute.

Butterfoss, F. D. (2007). Coalitions and partnerships in community health. Jossey-Bass.
Chaskin, R. J. (2001). Building community capacity: A definitional framework and case studies from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36(3), 291–323.

Chavis, D.M. (2001). The paradoxes and promise of community coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology. 29(2), 309–320.

Chavis, D.M. (1995). Building community capacity to prevent violence through coalitions and partnerships. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 6(2), 234–244.

Florin, P., Mitchell, R., & Stevenson, J. (1993). Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: A developmental approach. Health Education Research, 8(3), 417–432.

Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36–41.

McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.

Wolff, T., Minkler, M., Wolfe, S. M., Berkowitz, B., Bowen, L., Dunn Butterfoss, F., Francisco, V., Himmelman, A. T., Lee, K. S., & Nagy, G. (2017). Collaborating for equity and justice: Moving beyond collective impact. Nonprofit Quarterly.